Saturday, July 10, 2010

Watch out, here comes an intellectual.

We have come to the point, in our campaigns, where candidates for elected office believe they have to play dumb to be elected. The campaign commercials running
reflect the most elementary reasons for choosing a candidate, and usually negative
information about the opponents character and positions. Discussion about the nation's problems is kept to simple terms, all black and white, so the voting public can avoid thinking and vote by emotion or party loyalty. Digging deep you will
discover that most candidates are more intelligent than represented by their campaign, but in the prevailing political mood intellect frightens many potential voters. The simplistic, jingoistic Sarah Palin/Tea Party philosophy has so intimidated politicians that they feel compelled to echo it, even if aware of how
empty it is.

I could name several candidates for national office who have achieved brilliant
records in academe, and in public office, who are playing down or concealing their
achievements. I won't because revealing them may impair their election chances.
How sad! If ever we needed the Best and Brightest, now is the time. Let them rise
above ambition and teach while campaigning instead of joining the howling pack!

2 comments:

jacquesmaxx said...

Can political candidates enter into intelligent discussions?
Not possible.
They belong to one of two parties and must restrict their pronouncements to the party line. They must follow the platform and confine their statements to the official policy.
Above all they have to simplify their words to the level of understanding of the voters which is nationally at the fourth grade level.
As the expression goes: K.I.S.S.

Jacques

jacquesmaxx said...

Intelligent discussion requires time for the various proponents to verbalize their opinions.

Nowadays their pronouncements are reduced to sound bites on TV or the radio, to Twitter diminutive entries and to cryptic text messages limited by the resiliency of our thumbs.
No need and no time for substantial considerations.

Time magazine presents a “Briefing” section in the front of each issue where in a few pages readers can learn the “News of the World”, “Verbatim” quotes and “Milestones” for the week. You can skip the rest of the analyses.

Gone are the days when Adlai Stevenson could entertain us at length from his chair on TV to give us time to ponder on the hole in the sole of his shoe.
Intelligent discussion in 2010 is a luxury that the cellphone and the internet do not allow us to enjoy any longer.


Jacques